Barriers and bounds to Rationality
نویسنده
چکیده
This review article takes Peter Albin’s book Barriers and Bounds of Rationality : Essays on Economic Complexity and Dynamics in Interacti6e Systems as the starting point of a general assessment of complexity analysis from the point of view of the scope and limits of human rationality. In particular, this article examines the constraints upon human rationality. In particular, this article examines the constraints upon human rationality deriving from Gödel’s theorem, computational complexity, chaotic behavior and interconnections among system components. Gödel’s theorem is especially relevant in cases of self-reference (as in game-like situations); computational complexity makes search for optimal solutions often to exceed the capacity of the existing computers even in the case of relatively ‘simple’ problems; chaotic behavior makes long-term prediction impossible; cellular automa suggest that entirely different outcomes may result from small differences in patterns of interdependence. Special attention is devoted to the use of cellular automa in identifying the nature of non-linearities compatible with aggregation; in assessing the role of a central actor in a in a decentralized market economy; in discovering ‘simple-minded principles’ by which market equilibria can be brought about. In conclusion, the article suggests that a new theoretical paradigm is emerging, in which the search for invariant laws would be substituted by attention for historical conditions and localized patterns of interaction. © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. JEL classification: D80; C90; E37; O41
منابع مشابه
Barriers and Bounds to Rationality: Essays on Economic Complexity and Dynamics in Interactive Systems
متن کامل
Barriers and Bounds to Rationality: Essays on Economic Complexity and Dynamics in Interactive Systems by Peter S. Albin, Edited by Duncan K. Foley
متن کامل
Extending the Bounds of Rationality: Evidence and Theories of Preferential Choice
Most economists define rationality in terms of consistency principles. These principles place “bounds” on rationality—bounds that range from perfect consistency to weak stochastic transitivity. Several decades of research on preferential choice has demonstrated how and when people violate these bounds. Many of these violations are interconnected and reflect systematic behavioral principles. We ...
متن کاملJurisprudence and Rationality
There are different concepts of rationality: specific rationality, normative rationality and instrumental rationality whose limitation covers the holistic rationality and represents the fate of rationality in the West. Thus following Hume reason became the slave of feelings and lost its authority for choosing the goal. In Islamic culture reason with its undeniable background in Shariah enjoy...
متن کاملBounded Reasoning: Rationality or Cognition∗
Bounded reasoning about rationality can have important implications for behavior. These bounds are typically viewed as an artifact of limits in the ability to engage in interactive reasoning, i.e., to reason through “I think, you think, I think, etc ...” However, in principle, these bounds need not be determined by limits in ability. This paper develops a novel identification strategy to show t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000